Borax Postad 22 Juni , 2005 Rapport Postad 22 Juni , 2005 Should I have called this bluff? Should I have bet the river and if so how much? Anything else I could have done different in the hand? Read on player UTG: allways has something but might play top pair too far. Would normally not chase flush here. Read on player MP1: Nothing at all, never played him before. 0.25/0.5$ NL 10 players Dealt to Borax in UTG+2: Q Q ------------------ OpeningBetRound ------------------ SB : Posts small blind 0.25 BB : Posts big blind 0.50 X : Sitting out UTG : Calls for 0.50 UTG+1 : Folds Borax : Raises for 2.00 MP1 : Calls for 2.00 MP2 : Folds CO : Folds Button : Folds SB : Folds BB : Folds UTG : Calls for 1.50 ------------------ Flop T 2 6 ------------------ UTG : Checks Borax : Bets 7.00 MP1 : Calls for 7.00 UTG : Calls for 7.00 ------------------ Turn 9 ------------------ UTG : Checks Borax : Bets 15.00 MP1 : Calls for 15.00 UTG : Calls for 15.00 ------------------ River 3 ------------------ UTG : Checks (37$ left in stack) Borax : Checks (25$ left in stack) MP1 : Went all-in 57.85 UTG : Folds Borax : Folds MP1 : Shows cards - A 6 - (a pair of 6's) ------------------ Result ------------------ UTG: Mucked Cards Borax: Mucked Cards Q Q MP1: Showed Cards A 6 - (Winning) 127.60 ------------------ * RP - QoS Citera
gdaily Postad 22 Juni , 2005 Rapport Postad 22 Juni , 2005 Welcome to POKERFORUM.nu Borax, always nice to see a non-swede here Citera
gdaily Postad 22 Juni , 2005 Rapport Postad 22 Juni , 2005 On the flop, you make a potsized bet. Thats good. On the turn, you bet about two thirds of the pot, leaving you with about half a pot-bet left. I myself would have bet slightly more, about the size of the pot (say $20), having only $20 left in my stack after this. By doing so, I know for sure that a) Any drawing hand will bnever get correct pot-odds to draw, even considering any implied odds of me paying of an bet on the river. On the river, since I would only have $20 left and the pot would be $80 after my opponent bets, it would be correct to call if I think he blussf more than one out of five times. In the scenario that you are describing, you have to call if you think your opponent bluffs more that one out of four times (roughly). If you think that he bluss that often - call. I would have folded - he played good. Citera
Borax Postad 22 Juni , 2005 Författare Rapport Postad 22 Juni , 2005 gdaily wroteWelcome to POKERFORUM.nu Borax, always nice to see a non-swede here Even a Norwegian? Thank you very much The forum looks great from what I have read so far. Jeg er som sagt norsk og er litt usikker på om jeg skal poste på engelsk eller norsk? Citera
Dahlberg Postad 22 Juni , 2005 Rapport Postad 22 Juni , 2005 det går bra att posta på norska Välkommen till forumet! Citera
Machista Postad 22 Juni , 2005 Rapport Postad 22 Juni , 2005 Jeg er som sagt norsk og er litt usikker på om jeg skal poste på engelsk eller norsk? Va? Citera
Frege Postad 22 Juni , 2005 Rapport Postad 22 Juni , 2005 Jeg er som sagt norsk og er litt usikker på om jeg skal poste på engelsk eller norsk? Va? "Jag är som sagt norrman och är lite osäker på om jag ska skriva på engelska eller norska." Citera
Machista Postad 22 Juni , 2005 Rapport Postad 22 Juni , 2005 Jeg er som sagt norsk og er litt usikker på om jeg skal poste på engelsk eller norsk? Va? "Jag är som sagt norrman och är lite osäker på om jag ska skriva på engelska eller norska." Ah! Ok. Tack. Citera
Borax Postad 22 Juni , 2005 Författare Rapport Postad 22 Juni , 2005 gsaily wroteOn the flop, you make a potsized bet. Thats good. On the turn, you bet about two thirds of the pot, leaving you with about half a pot-bet left. I myself would have bet slightly more, about the size of the pot (say $20), having only $20 left in my stack after this. By doing so, I know for sure that a) Any drawing hand will bnever get correct pot-odds to draw, even considering any implied odds of me paying of an bet on the river. On the river, since I would only have $20 left and the pot would be $80 after my opponent bets, it would be correct to call if I think he blussf more than one out of five times. In the scenario that you are describing, you have to call if you think your opponent bluffs more that one out of four times (roughly). If you think that he bluss that often - call. I would have folded - he played good. Thanks for the analysis. Actually the pot was about 28$ after the flop, so my 15$ bet on the turn was close to half pot only and a pot size bet would be 25-30$ (my stack 40$), in my opinion committing me to the pot. I think I held back on purpose to have an escape route if raised all-in on the flop by a set. Like you say I was probably too passive to drive a draw out of the pot and should have played with more aggression. Hm...still in english...lol I'm used to posting in english so I might continue to do it by habit Machista and lither Citera
busen Postad 22 Juni , 2005 Rapport Postad 22 Juni , 2005 As far as the birds are concerned, I think not Citera
Machista Postad 22 Juni , 2005 Rapport Postad 22 Juni , 2005 I would have folded - he played good. Skulle du kunna komma med en allmän åsikt av detta sätt att spela - att syna med en rätt usel hand (eller egentligen vilka två kort som helst) eftersom man sätter preflopraisaren på höga pocks och sen bestämma sig för att bluffa rakt igenom om brädet består av låga kort. Jag har gjort detta några få gånger när spelaren i fråga varit uppenbart tight och vek. Jag har själv råkat ut för det flera gånger och säkert några till när folk inte visat. Hur ska man förhålla sig till detta sätt spela? Ska det ingå i standardarsenalen vid shorthanded och/eller fullbord? Citera
Borax Postad 22 Juni , 2005 Författare Rapport Postad 22 Juni , 2005 busen wroteAs far as the birds are concerned, I think not The point is the birds. They do all right. Don't they? Citera
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.