Macroman Postad 21 Februari , 2007 Rapport Postad 21 Februari , 2007 Här ett pokertest för er som orkar göra ett lite längre test. http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=9239211&an=0&page=0#Post9239211 Testet känns väl halvok i alla fall. Mitt resultat blev 124. Suger gällande donkaments obv. Rubriken är bara ett marknadsföringstrick... Citera
Kenan83 Postad 21 Februari , 2007 Rapport Postad 21 Februari , 2007 http://www.pokerforum.nu/forum/showthread.php?t=26516&highlight=www.donkeytest.com http://www.pokerforum.nu/forum/showthread.php?t=28503&highlight=www.donkeytest.com Citera
Macroman Postad 21 Februari , 2007 Författare Rapport Postad 21 Februari , 2007 http://www.pokerforum.nu/forum/showthread.php?t=26516&highlight=www.donkeytest.com http://www.pokerforum.nu/forum/showthread.php?t=28503&highlight=www.donkeytest.com Wow, jag är inte alls med i matchen tydligen... wp Citera
spinner Postad 21 Februari , 2007 Rapport Postad 21 Februari , 2007 Kul! Orkar inte göra det just nu dock... Citera
Grymme Postad 21 Februari , 2007 Rapport Postad 21 Februari , 2007 Wehej... Jag fick ju bättre än jag trodde iallafall... Poker IQ Score Your General Poker IQ Score is 132 and shows how skilled you are in general. Anyone with a score this high is considered to be a high stakes pro. This score is better than 95.22% of all persons taking this test. You have a strong technical understanding of poker and should expect to do well in medium to high stakes NL hold'em. You scored higher than your average percentile score in 8 individual ability categories. 2 of these better scores could be called statistically significant and may indicate special abilities, or that you were distracted on those parts of the IQ Test that counted more heavily in the other ability categories. Position Solving many of the IQ Test's problems required the ability to analyze your position at the table, considering blind levels and stack sizes, the tendencies of your opponents and the strength of your hand.. Many poker situations require analysis of position. The ability to play in and out of position strongly is required for skilled NL hold'em players. Your Positional Play score of 73% is not significantly different from your average percentile score.This score is better than 93.74% of all persons taking this test. Blinds Understanding what changes occur when out of postion but required to put in half a bet are important. By far, the blinds will be any NL hold'em player's least profitable seats. It is important to play out of the blinds correctly in order to minimize losses over time. Your Blinds score of 64% is significantly lower than your average percentile score.This score is better than 82.47% of all persons taking this test. Tournaments This is the ability to change your strategy, hand strengths, calling and pushing ranges as blinds and antes rise. It is most useful during tournament play, but is useful in dealing with short stacks in deeper stacked cash game play. It is important to learn tournament skills even for cash game specialists. Strong tournament skills should translate to more tournament cashes and deeper finishes. Your Tournament Play score of 55% is significantly lower than your average percentile score.This score is better than 63.06% of all persons taking this test. Big Pairs The ability to play big pairs correctly is important for any successful NL hold'em player. Although over time big pairs will be the most profitable hands, playing them incorrectly can lead to disasterous results. Beginners get themselves into trouble by slow playing and/or overplaying big pairs, and often try to be excessively tricky with them. Although poor players sometimes play their big pairs correctly, it is rare. In general better players will win more and lose less with JJ+ as they gain skill and experience. Your Big Pairs score of 84% is exceptionally higher than your average percentile score.This score is better than 98.83% of all persons taking this test. Small and Medium Pairs The ability to play small and medium pairs is typically difficult for beginners. Typically beginners will call too much pre-flop with these hands and overplay overpairs on the flop. Folding a set is rarely correct but sometimes necessary. Your Small and Medium Pairs score of 93% is exceptionally higher than your average percentile score.This score is better than 99.79% of all persons taking this test. Bluffing Bluffing is big part of NL hold'em. Bluffing and semi bluffing at the right times, recognizing that an opponent is likely to be bluffing and acting accordingly is important. Balancing your own bluffs and adjusting opponent calling ranges is essential. Your Bluffing score of 77% is not significantly different from your average percentile score.This score is better than 96.41% of all persons taking this test. Flop Texture Adjusting your play based on the "texture" of the flop is important. The flop cards should be analyzed in light of your opponent's tendencies, his suspected hand range, and the strength of your own hand. Failing to include the flop texture in your post flop decision making is a typical beginner mistake and is easily disasterous. As you gain experience in NL hold'em and play against more experienced opponents, it will become second nature and of paramount importance. Your Flop Texture score of 77% is not significantly different from your average percentile score.This score is better than 96.41% of all persons taking this test. Pot Odds Sometimes you are required to call when you know you're losing because the price is right. Sometimes you must fold because you're facing a bet that is too big or becase an opponent does not have enought money behind to justify an implied odds call. Failing to make the correct odds calls is a major error. Sometimes it is correct to call in some surprising situations. Your Pot Odds score of 73% is not significantly different from your average percentile score.This score is better than 93.74% of all persons taking this test. Logic Logically analyzing the action during a hand is important. Players with strong logical ability are quicker to see where a given set of conditions is leading, better understand the technical aspects of the game, often move up quickly in stakes and have little trouble with bankroll management. Your Logic score of 81% is not significantly different from your average percentile score.This score is better than 98.06% of all persons taking this test. Betting Patterns An awareness of betting patterns serves a number of purposes. It is useful for analyzing the playing styles of opponents and for finding errors in your own game. Often beginning players have no awareness of common betting patterns. Experienced players are somtimes able to watch a hand, adjust for the skill, experience and tendencies of each player and determine almost exactly what each player holds. Your Betting Patterns score of 79% is not significantly different from your average percentile score.This score is better than 97.34% of all persons taking this test. Hand Selection It is important choose which hands to play by adjusting for position, stack sizes, and the tendencies of your opponents. Beginners often have no awareness of relative hand strength, often play weak hands out of position, or easily dominated hands against tight opponents. Your Hand selection score of 77% is not significantly different from your average percentile score.This score is better than 96.41% of all persons taking this test. Aggression Aggression is important in poker. It increases your equity in most hands by giving you an extra way to win the pot. Your opponent may fold. Playing passively yields only one way to win -- with the best hand at showdown. Beginners typically play too loose and too passive. Excessively aggressive players will lose less than passive players. A balanced tight aggressive strategy is typically best for NL holde'em depending on game conditions and stack sizes. Loose aggressive style is more difficult to master but can often be extremely profitable. Your Aggression score of 76% is not significantly different from your average percentile score.This score is better than 95.85% of all persons taking this test. Computational Speed Solving problems quickly indicates a combination of experience and card sense. Experienced players can often play most hands automatically, and only require significant thought for the most complex situations. Experienced players should easily answer a good amount of the questions on this test, leaving extra time to focus on the more complex situations. Your Computational Speed score of 65% is significantly lower than your average percentile score.This score is better than 84.13% of all persons taking this test. Citera
jojje2k Postad 21 Februari , 2007 Rapport Postad 21 Februari , 2007 Måste bara få skryta lite Spelade paren bättre än 99,5% av alla som gjort testet. Tyvärr sög mitt blindsspel och "Computational Speed" eftersom jag kollade på Champions league samtidigt. 134 fick jag totalt iaf Citera
JoeFalk Postad 21 Februari , 2007 Rapport Postad 21 Februari , 2007 Jojje2k skrev: Måste bara få skryta lite Spelade paren bättre än 99,5% av alla som gjort testet. Tyvärr sög mitt blindsspel och "Computational Speed" eftersom jag kollade på Champions league samtidigt. 134 fick jag totalt iaf Andra gången gillt Citera
jojje2k Postad 21 Februari , 2007 Rapport Postad 21 Februari , 2007 Jojje2k skrev: Andra gången gillt Hmmm jag gjorde testet för flera månader sen så jag minns inte ett skit. Citera
Pokershark Postad 21 Februari , 2007 Rapport Postad 21 Februari , 2007 Gjorde ett liknande test eller om det var samma för några månader sen. Inte konstigt att jag inte kan vinna längre. Förra gången fick jag 134 och den här gången 121 Dock så tror jag att jag svarade förra gången som jag trodde att de ville och den här gången hur jag själv skulle ha spelat i den situationen. Citera
greywolf Postad 21 Februari , 2007 Rapport Postad 21 Februari , 2007 testet är inte helt värdelöst men nästan. En del frågor är sjukt lätta och en del är så löjligt marginella. vissa frågor har dom helt enkelt fel svar på (alt det är väldigt marginellt och flera rätta svar finns). Typ alla frågor är ledande och har sjukt träffsäkra reads som gör att det är rätt självklart vad dom vill man ska svara. I några frågor spelar Hjälten som en idiot och får ett beslut som inte borde ha uppkommit. Typisk fråga ser ut såhär: Hjälten Har KK i BB. UTG som är megajättecptight öppnar upp UTG. ännu tightare snubbe i mp återhöjer pott och Dan glimne sitter på knappen och raisar halva stacken. VAD ska hjälten göra nu? Valen är 1: syna och folda om det inte kommer en kung på floppen. 2 allin 2,356567% av gångerna och syna och pusha flopp 97.67535% av gångerna. 3: FOLD. Citera
Grymme Postad 22 Februari , 2007 Rapport Postad 22 Februari , 2007 haha...det är klart att ett sånt test inte "är vetenskapligt säkerställt". Å andra sidan är de la tillverkat av någon som kan mer poker och spelar högre än de flesta på Pokerforum.nu (om jag inte minns fel från 2+2tråden). Poängen måste ju vara att analysera typsituationer och komma så nära som möjligt. Jag tyckte testet var bra iallafall, riktigt svåra frågor. Vad det sedan ger är väl en bra fråga. För mig kändes det iallafall som om testet lyckades nagla fram mina dåliga sidor (turneringar, blindsspel) och bra sidor (par och positionsspel) ganska väl. Sedan för de som säger att "flera av svaren är fel". Den som tycker så lider ju uppenbarligen av samma feltänk som den som skapade testet, dvs. tron att man kan få fram ett "rätt" eller "fel" svar genom att analysera några få rader i ett quiz/på ett forum. Personligen känns handanalys på forum el. dylikt mest som ett skämt nuförtiden; som att bygga en dator av playmobildelar. Citera
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.