Vad är snittraken på de olika nivåerna/sajterna?

[Sigges]

Go'kväll

 

Är det någon som har en bra uppskattning om vad snittraken ligger på olika bet-nivåer(0,5/1-100/200), 10-pers/6-pers, på olika nät, party/prima osv...

...eller kanske någon bra länk där man kan hitta den infon.

kanske den finns gömd i pokertracker(som jag inte kan använda på min supermac).Om så, någon som vill ta en titt och rapportera?

Tänkte plugga lite matte ser ni.

 

ex.

Partys 1/2 FL 10manna: $12.34

Pokerroom(betsson) 10/20FL 6-manna: $31.22

Prima 500/1000FL HU: 2$

osv...

(byt alltså ut mina exempelsiffror mot de riktiga)

 

Tack å hej så länge!

 

F'låt QoS om jag skrev i fel tråd och satte fel rubrik

[lfx]

Från 2+2. Nyss postad..

 

Partypoker rake statistics

______Avg Pot|Avg Rake|Rake % of Pot|Rake in BB/100|Sample Size

.5/1____7.77____0.37______4.71_________4.19________576

1/2____13.78___0.59______4.27_________2.94________795

2/4____27.55___0.92______3.35_________2.41________984

3/6____44.46___1.56______3.51_________2.63________1670

5/10___65.00___2.09______3.21_________1.89________1582

10/20__117.90__2.56______2.17_________1.22________743

15/30__224.90__2.65______1.18_________0.97________82862

30/60__447.79__2.94______0.66_________0.42________2769

 

Methodology:

The "sample" column is the number of hands used for the calculations. This includes the hands I have actually played- 12500 hands at 15/30, 50 hands at 10/20, and 150 hands at 30/60, and a whole lot of hands that I let pokertracker observe while I was at work or was sleeping. All hands are 6-handed or greater, except for <500 I have played shorthanded at 15/30 (I don't import observed hands <6-handed... and I'm switching that to 8-handed). The avg pot and rake numbers may be a touch high, because I usually observe tables with the longest wait lists (so they're most likely to last 8 hours) and those tables tend to have larger pots than average... at least at first.

 

The "Rake BB/100" column signifies how how many big bets the average player pays in rake every hundred hands at that limit. I pulled this rake/100 from the "BB/100" summary total column of pokertracker- When all players wins and losses' are added up, what's left is the rake.

 

Observations:

Tight players will pay less than the stated Rake BB/100 numebr, because they win fewer pots than the average player. For Instance, I carry a 21.5% VP$IP at 15/30, I have won 8.4% of the hands I have been dealt, and I have paid 17% less than the norm.

 

It makes sense that 3/6 is more expensive in Rake BB/100 than 2/4 because it is equivilant to playing 2/4 where .66 is raked at $13, $27, and $40, compared to real 2/4 where $1 is raked at 20/40/60... in the 3/6-type rake, you almost always get to .66, and usually 1.33, whereas in real 2/4 you're more often just hitting $1, and even avoiding that occasionally... enough to make up for the $3 poss. rake.

 

Sample sizes may be a bit low at the low end, but I'm still pretty confident there's some validity to the low limit numbers. If you want something more accurate, do it yourself .

 

That's all.. just thought someone else might like to see this information. Anyone know how to make a table look right on these forums?

 

2ndGoat

[Sigges]

Stort tack lfx